Letters to Editors

Letters to the Editor at local papers are one of our greatest communicative tools. See our Links section for a list of addresses for local media websites where you can e-mail your thoughts or a letter to the editor.

Differing Views

Fairfax Station/Clifton Connection

To the Editor:

I cannot understand why I continue to receive mailers and phone calls from the McDonnell and Cuccinelli campaigns. I suppose Mr. McDonnell would like me to forget his “thesis,” and Mr. Cuccinelli wants to reinforce his motto, “Don’t Tread on Me.” However, on every issue, neither one represents me. Both men have not only failed to support funding for education and transportation, they also wish to control the most personal aspects of our lives. For those of us who lost someone we loved at Virginia Tech, they ignore commonsense gun laws and despite proclamations of being pro-life, filed bills to expand gun rights with little regard for public safety.

Mr. McDonnell may claim his “thesis” is history, but from 1998-2003, he repeatedly and unsuccessfully submitted bills to establish Covenant Marriage. Mr. Cuccinelli co-patroned a failing bill with Dels. Bob Marshall and Dick Black requiring that individuals would incur a Class 6 felony if they provided a minor with a contraceptive knowing that the minor was involved with someone three years older. Imagine arresting parents or doctors who, aware of a consensual teenage relationship, suggest protection against pregnancy, AIDs or sexually transmitted disease?

In 2004, both McDonnell and Cuccinelli patroned bills urging Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to declare that civil unions or domestic partnerships, regardless of whether they were single sex or opposite sex, would not be valid or recognized in the United States. Therefore, seniors who chose to live together because they might lose a deceased spouse’s pension or any other adults, who for whatever reason, chose to live together, would be blocked from legally protecting their partner. Even businesses recognize that right.

Both men may declare they are Fairfax’s own, but in 2004, Mr. McDonnell patroned and Mr. Cuccinelli voted for a bill that prohibited local governments from determining their own gun laws. Mr. McDonnell also patroned a failing bill that would have reduced restrictions on hunting near subdivisions. Ironically, while Mr. Cuccinelli opposed the Melendez decision because it imposed more court time, he patroned an unsuccessful bill that would have required courts to prove disqualifications for conceal carry by “clear and convincing evidence.”

Most frustrating is both men’s refusal to consider implementing common sense gun laws such as background checks for unlicensed sales at gun shows, even though the Virginia Tech Panel recommended doing so and the majority of Virginians support it. Rather, both men believe that by addressing the mental health component of the VT tragedy, they resolved the issue. Both men insist that background checks are already conducted at gun shows and they are unwilling to interfere with what they consider “private” sales at a very large, very public event. Licensed dealers do conduct background checks at gun shows, but individual sellers do not, thereby allowing buyers who wish to avoid a background check, to purchase a weapon even if they are a convicted felon, under a court order, or have been deemed dangerous to themselves or another. Mr. Cuccinelli publicly declared that he would “trade off” background checks for conceal carry on campus. If both men truly care about public safety, particularly of our children, then they would agree a two-minute background check is not an imposition, but a necessity. For those of us who lost someone at Virginia Tech, we can attest that saving lives should be at the forefront of any campaign for governor and attorney general, and is just as important as the core issues of education, transportation and the economy. And that is what is most important to me.

Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb

Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Hallmarks of a Good Governor

The Washington Post
The Post is asking readers to make the case for their favored candidate in the Virginia governor’s race in 200 words or less.

Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb
Centreville

I know R. Creigh Deeds personally and called him after the Virginia Tech tragedy, which took the life of a precious young woman whom I loved as a daughter. He initially resisted the idea of background checks for private sales at gun shows, telling me that I did not understand rural culture. But he listened, and he understood that common sense dictates that background checks weed out those who would do harm. Robert F. McDonnell continues to oppose these checks.

In addition, Deeds has always supported investing in public education so Virginia can retain its world-class universities and strong K-12 public schools. This advocacy for education and his ability to listen and respond are the hallmarks of a good governor.

Article at the Washington Post


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Proper Compromise

CentreView South

To the Editor:
National Health Care has been intensively debated during August. After its recess Congress resumes its session, with the need to decide this and other very important issues.
Incorporation of a public health insurance policy is a major question. Democrats believe that this is essential to control the cost of government. Republicans think that it would lead to socialized medicine, thereby ruining the country.
Some Republicans believe that the acute deficiencies including the high cost of our present health care system can be corrected without the public option, but, in their spirit of compromise and cooperation, they have offered to accept it, but only after delaying it for five years in a trial period. They say that this would allow, or rather, encourage the health insurance industry to reduce costs and get their house in order.
I do not usually agree with Republican views, but I would tend to agree — almost — with this proposal. I would insist, however, that the sequence be reversed: the public option must be included in the health care bill, and should take effect immediately. Then Republicans and Democrats, after a five-year trial period, could review the happenings and could pose changes perceived to be needed. By then all should know if health care costs were under control, or otherwise.
This seems to me to be the proper compromise — legislators are always looking for one. It should make Democrats and some Republicans happy, and could produce enough votes in Congress to easily pass it. Americans could then live happy and healthy lives, at peace with one another, ever after.

Larry Baldwin
Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

McDonnell no friend of public education

Centreville Times
By: Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb, Centreville

Having received one too many mailers declaring Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell as Northern Virginia’s or Fairfax’s Own, especially on the issue of education, I feel compelled to write. McDonnell — like his running mate, Sen. Ken Cuccinelli (R-Dist. 37) — has a long history of blocking and not supporting funding for public education and imposing his ideology on students.

Reviewing the legislative histories of McDonnell (from 1994 to 2005) and Cuccinelli (from 2002 to 2009) brought back a flood of memories of Richmond’s unwarranted and continued intrusion into our schools and universities, while at the same time failing to adequately fund them. Rather than addressing real educational issues, McDonnell supported such failing bills as former Del. Dick Black’s (R-Dist. 32) requiring school boards to make sure students understood why they had a moment of silence each day; former Del. Roger McClure’s (R-Dist. 67) making family life education an opt-in, rather than opt-out procedure; and denying gay students the right to form clubs. Cuccinelli may use the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag motto representing “less intrusive” government, but he, along with Black, tried to stop a student-run health fair at George Mason University in 2005. He has had a long history of contempt for K-12 education, calling administrators “educrats” and deeming funding spent on Fairfax students as out-of-line despite the fact the Fairfax County ranks in the middle in the metropolitan area on per-pupil spending but ranks at the top for SAT scores.

More importantly, both men have consistently voted against monies allocated toward K-12 education and universities. In the 2001 Special Session, McDonnell did not vote for Del. Jim Dillard’s (R-Dist. 41) bill providing revenue for public K-12 and universities. In 2004, both McDonnell and Cuccinelli voted against the budget bill funding schools, a bill supported by the business community and forged in a compromise with then-Gov. Mark Warner (D) and moderate Republicans such as Dillard and former Sens. John Chichester (R-Dist. 28) and Russell Potts (R-Dist. 27). These men understood that in order to succeed, Virginia had to invest in its schools.

Despite McDonnell’s claims that he will get more Fairfax County students into top universities, he cannot do this unless he is willing to replace the monies our universities receive from out-of state students, who pay three times the in-state tuition. In 1995, McDonnell co-patroned former Sen. Jay O’Brien’s (R-Dist. 39) failing bill that would make the in-state ratio 67 percent of students. Although Sen. O’Brien and Del. Tim Hugo (R-Dist. 40) continued to introduce bills mandating more in-state students, they never included the funding necessary to replace out-of-state tuition. Richmond only provides 8 percent of our colleges’ funding. Unless Richmond is willing to fund our top universities adequately, they will continue on their go-it-alone path, relying on corporations, alumni and non-profit donations — and more out-of-state students.

What concerns me most, however, is that although McDonnell claims his “thesis” is irrelevant, it represents the mindset of Richmond in the 1990s.

One of the most destructive, long-lasting policies was the introduction of the Standards of Learning, a move that was so poorly drafted and so clearly biased that superintendents traveled from all over the state to object at the first hearing. Thankfully, our more courageous teachers did not “teach to the test” but encouraged creative and analytical thought, preserving our strong school system. My fear is that should these two gentlemen be elected, we would return right back to those times and have to begin the slow climb back, like we did under Gov. Warner. Their past legislative history and ideology do matter, and we, the voters, should pay attention — especially given our belief in a strong educational system and desire to get our children into the nation’s top universities.


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Cuccinelli Misrepresents Gun Show Loophole

Dear Editor:

State Senator Ken Cuccinelli chose this month – the anniversary of Virginia Tech – to announce his candidacy for Attorney General. He affirms his strong support and leadership in defense of the Second Amendment, alleging that facts are on his side, emotions on the other.

Mr. Cuccinelli claims that SB 109, requiring background checks for private sales at gun shows, added nothing new. Although Senator Cuccinelli had been present all morning during the hearing of other bills before the Senate Courts of Justice Committee, he strolled in 25 minutes after the break, therefore missing arguments in favor of SB 109. He was not there to hear the testimony of John Marshall, Governor Kaine’s Public Safety Officer, Colonel Gerald Massengill, Chair of the Virginia Tech Panel, Colonel Steven Flaherty, Superintendent of Police, numerous sheriffs and Virginia Tech parents, including his constituent, Joseph Samaha. He was present, however, for those representing the NRA and VCDL. No wonder he heard nothing new.

On the Senate floor, Senator Cuccinelli recounted his experience at the C & E Gun Show held at Dulles Expo Center in February to support his opposition to background checks of private sales at gun shows. Touring the tables with the gun show operator, he found very few private sellers and the ones he found sold antique guns. Only one was selling a semi-automatic Sig Sauer handgun. No mention of the fact that this gun could be sold without a background check. I was also at that gun show. Mr. Cuccinelli failed to mention that private sellers walk up and down the aisles, rifles and guns strapped to their bodies, selling their guns on the floor and in the corners of the gun show. And they sell these weapons without background checks to total strangers.

Mr. Cuccinelli suggests it is hard to distinguish licensed dealers from private sellers. Not really. Licensed dealers have laptop computers and clipboards on their tables because they are required to run background checks. Mr. Cuccinelli also suggests that vendors become paranoid when you ask them questions. In fact, we found them extremely informative and quite helpful. When questioned, the licensed dealer of machine guns and assault weapons told us people buy them for practice. The Glock dealer informed us that private sellers do not have to outlay $100 per table in the center of the hall or $110 for wall space like he did nor do they have to conduct background checks, suggesting inequities between vendors at a gun show.

Mr. Cuccinelli concludes in his Compass, “(A)fter I related our extensive gathering of those pesky, stubborn facts…there were many sour looks on the faces of the gun-grabbing liberals. And what were they going to do? Argue emotions (again) of course.”

This has been my experience with facts and emotion:

On Advocacy Day, a group of us gathered on the Capitol Grounds to commemorate those who had died from gun violence. We had obtained a permit to do so because we understand that with rights come responsibilities and that the freedom to assemble usually requires a permit in order to retain order and public safety. A large group advocating gun rights completely encircled us, mocking and jeering. They had no permit. They were rude and insensitive to the parents and students who had gathered there. It was they who were disrespectful.

At the Supreme Court, I held my poster with pictures of Reema and Erin Peterson, their memorial services and the wounded being carried out at Virginia Tech. Again, gun rights advocates encircled me, staff from the Brady campaign and the Quakers holding cut outs of children. Others pointed fingers at our chest, confronting us again and again. Any time I have expressed publicly the need for commonsense gun legislation, I am confronted. And no one can ever answer why they so virulently oppose background checks for private sales at gun shows. “It’s a nuisance”, “it impacts our liberty”, “it’s a cultural thing”, “it’s a Northern Virginia thing”. Legislators have told us our reasons are logical: it insures the public safety by making sure that those who would do harm do not obtain access to weapons. Yet, they vote against a simple background check, which takes five minutes and costs virtually nothing.

Are we the emotional ones? I suppose we are. After all, we are the ones who know one indisputable fact: Reema and Erin are dead and they are never coming back. And we grieve and mourn for them. After all, we’re only human.

Sincerely,

Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb Centreville, Virginia


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Kathy Smith Deserves Re-election

To the Editor:

Kathy Smith deserves re-election this November. Kathy has achieved some major accomplishments while serving as our Sully District School Board representative, including designing the curriculum so that our children are life-ready; she knows our children are more than a test score. Kathy also has been instrumental in bringing full-day kindergarten to more schools and developing a plan to bring it to all schools.

I know that for Kathy the best part of serving on the School Board is that she gets to help children achieve. The worst part is that she cannot please everyone. Any officeholder who, after being in office for six years has not upset some constituencies, probably is a legislator who is not doing their job.

As a parent, Kathy knows that parents and children feel connected to their schools – she understands that boundary issues are difficult and contentious. Some parents and neighborhoods want change, while others do not. Kathy will make a balanced decision.

Kathy supports later high school start times if they are economically feasible. How much should SLEEP cost? $10 million, $40 million, $100 million? At the behest of some parents, the School Board already has spent $274,000 to assess later high school start times, and a task force continues to study the issue.

What is the cost-benefit of SLEEP? If we spend funds to rearrange school start times, other items will not get funded; what will we choose not to do – reduce class size, provide school-based GT resources, have staffed clinics to deal with staph infection outbreaks? We need a strong leader like Kathy to ensure that the most pressing needs of all students are addressed.

Finally, Kathy’s opponent plans to use the health care system as a model for education. Oh please, no. No system is perfect, but we do not need to model Fairfax schools like our very broken health care system. Please join me in voting for Kathy Smith on Nov. 6.

Laura Granruth
Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Look at All Positions of the Candidates

Centre View

To the Editor:

It’s nearing the end of the campaign season and the Virginia Conservative Action Pac (VCAP) will probably put their fliers on cars in church parking lots, an offensive practice but not nearly as offensive as their failure to tell the whole story in their compare/contrast pieces of “pro-family” candidates. So, given that April 16 destroyed so many families, I will fill in the blanks.

GUNS: These flyers do not usually address this issue, which is troubling for those of us who knew Reema Samaha and Erin Peterson. On the very Sunday my dear friends, the Samahas, were at Virginia Tech to see the stone carved in memory of their daughter, Reema, I passed a volunteer for Sen. Ken Cuccinelli waving a “pro-family” sign in front of St. Veronica’s Church. How can someone who claims to be so “pro-family” be so “pro-gun?” Indeed, Mr. Cuccinelli chose this year, of all years, to host his first- ever Second Amendment fund-raiser at the NRA on June 23rd, which had she lived, would have been Reema’s 19th birthday.

Sen. Cuccinelli, along with Sen. Jay O’Brien and Del. Tim Hugo, received substantial funds and grades of A and/or A-minus from the NRA. These three legislators supported the positions of the Virginia Citizens Defense League 92 percent to 100 percent of the time. They would rather vote with their downstate, rural colleagues than reflect the views of their own constituents who believe that Virginia should pass common-sense gun legislation. Opposing Fairfax County’s efforts to regulate guns in county facilities, they believe that gun owners should be able, without limitation, to carry guns in day-care, teen, senior and recreation centers, libraries, parks and hospitals. Not even the NRA allows guns in its headquarters. They also oppose background checks for private sales in gun shows, allowing potential criminals to purchase guns.

Cuccinelli and Hugo believe patrons should be able to carry concealed weapons into establishments that serve alcohol and oppose a ban on assault weapons. Indeed, the President and Congress they helped to elect let the assault weapons ban elapse in 2004, allowing Seung-Hui Cho to purchase high-capacity magazines. Cuccinelli also believes in guns on college campuses.

MENTAL ILLNESS/SOCIAL SERVICES: For years, Virginia has underfunded its mental health and social services, because legislators like Cuccinelli, O’Brien and Hugo sign no-tax pledges and vote to deny or limit funding or suggest transferring funds from one social service sector to another. Indeed, when Fairfax County legislators gather to hear the requests of non-profit groups, Hugo is usually not present, Cuccinelli is late or leaves early and O’Brien is doing crossword puzzles, “because he’s heard it all before.” When delegates submitted requests for groups such as Best Buddies last session, Hugo gave them a very vocal “dressing down.”

I have seen the faces of grief, sorrow and anguish so profound that nothing will erase them from my memory. I have seen a community so shattered over the loss of two vibrant, beautiful young women that every day is a reminder of our loss. If we truly want to strengthen and help families, then we need to address the issues of mental health and other social services. And we need to address the easy accessibility of guns, assault weapons, guns on campus and background checks for all gun transactions. We, therefore, must look at ALL the positions of candidates and decide whether they truly represent our interests and community. More importantly, we need to decide whether the candidates we elect have the political will to make the changes necessary so that such a tragedy never happens again.

Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Olsezek Offers Moderate Voice

To the Editor:

If you believe in any kind of moderation in the government of the Commonwealth, please vote for Janet Oleszek for state senate. Her opponent, Ken Cuccinelli, is so conservative that he won’t even work with Republican leaders. The Washington Post on Sept. 6 wrote, “One of the General Assembly’s most ardent conservatives, Cuccinelli has been called extreme, radical, out of touch and worse.” He’s since changed his tune, of course, now that Fairfax is becoming increasingly urban. One-issue voters will turn out to support Cuccinelli, so it is up to us moderates to put someone like us in office.

Oleszek, a county School Board member, has a strong background in education and she has the support of of the Fairfax Education Association and the Virginia Education Association. Other endorsements come from Virginia AFL-CIO, the Sierra Club, and the Virginia League of Conservation Voters.

We need more people in government like Jim Webb and Tim Kaine. Please vote for Janet Oleszek on Nov. 6.

David Cooper
Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Virginia Lawmakers Fail to Increase Minimum Wage

The Examiner

To the Editor:

Virginia state Sen. Ken Cuccinelli, R-Fairfax, and Del. Tim Hugo, R-Centreville, find it so easy to ignore the position of Catholic Church when it comes to poor people. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has long supported an increase in the minimum wage, arguing that no one who works for a living should have to live in poverty in the wealthiest country on the face of the Earth.

Worse yet, in recent comments to the press, Cuccinelli had the gall to blame low wages on illegal immigrants, a really nice way to set people against each other instead of doing his job and creating good public policy. Is the senator saying that with a 1.9 percent unemployment rate, citizens are just waiting around for the immigration issue to be addressed so they can finally get a job? Prove it, senator.

Raising the minimum wage helps alleviate poverty immediately. People who are poor must earn proportionately more to buy necessities. Further, it puts more money into circulation, as workers spend the extra money in the local economy, which is a really good thing for local businesses.

Opponents of raising the minimum wage contend it will cause job loss. However, there are already numerous exemptions in place for small businesses to balance a wage increase. Meanwhile, Hugo says he wants to wait for the federal government to act. Huh? I thought he was all about keeping the feds out of making policy for the states. I would like to hear him deliver that explanation to a family with not enough money to meet their basic human needs.

Western Fairfax Christian Ministries, a local faith-based service organization, reports a 67 percent increase in food pantry requests. Families in western Fairfax need help now, but these lawmakers have failed the most vulnerable among us.

Laura Granruth
Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Schools Can’t Afford Another Unfunded Mandate

Centreville Times

To the Editor:

I would like to express my incredible disappointment over the passage of House Bill 1442 mandating that all students in the state of Virginia who seek a standard diploma take a two-year sequential course of career or technical education. Not only does this deny students their choice of electives, it also forces school boards to fund another unfunded mandate.

There are many reasons a student may seek a standard diploma over an advanced one: (1.) learning a foreign language may be difficult; (2.) they do not intend to go to a competitive college and therefore do not feel the need to take advanced science and math classes; and, (3.) they may choose to pursue their passion, especially in the fine or performing arts.

This bill impacts these students enormously. It is already an option that these students can choose career/tech education classes should they decide to work after high school or if they would like to supplement the electives they have chosen. But now the majority of legislators in the House have decided that what was once an option must be a mandate.

Let us take the example of a student who loves to act. They live for that theater class elective. In order to be in Theater 3 or 4 as a junior/senior, they have to take theater their first two years. This same student loves to play the guitar, so they sign up for guitar as their second elective their first and second years. These are the only electives they have as freshmen and sophomores because they must take the four core classes and PE.
Now, our standard diploma student is a junior and more electives open up. But now, they realize they are adept on the guitar and love jazz so they add that to their schedule. They decide they would like to try their hand at photography or drawing or painting. Maybe they would like to take a seminar on Shakespeare to learn more about the master playwright. But now, our legislators have deemed our budding actors/musicians/artists incapable of supporting themselves by pursuing an artistic curriculum. They have to choose from business/accounting/computer classes or be bused to an academy at another high school to take courses ranging from culinary arts/auto mechanics or medical professions.

They must have an industry certification or occupational competency assessment. Choosing a sequence of courses in the fine and performing arts is just not good enough.

Or perhaps our standard diploma student wants to go to college but cannot handle an advanced course load. They love photography and the literary magazine; they work their way up to editor and portfolio prep. Perhaps, they take creative writing or other upper-level English classes.

But no, that’s not good enough either. Our legislators have mandated that they be sidetracked into another sequence of classes – classes that prepare them for the workplace. But remember, they would like to go to college and want a strong resume.

Our legislators have already mandated core classes and SOL exams. Maybe next year they can fill in the rest of our kids’ schedules because apparently kids cannot be trusted to make good choices – especially our artistic and creative ones.

Lu Ann Maciulla McNabb
Centreville


Posted in Letters to Editors | Leave a comment

Next Meeting

Tue. September 7th, 2010 7:30 PM
Sully District Government Center
4900 Stonecroft Boulevard
Chantilly, VA 20151

Letters to Editors Archives